Search in Huibslog
About myself

HUIB
Riethof, Brussels

Huib.jpg...more
...meer
...en savoir plus
...mehr

View Huib Riethof's profile on LinkedIn
PUB
This area does not yet contain any content.
Latest Comments
My Social Pages

Journal RSS Menu

 
Email Subscription (free)
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Powered by Squarespace
Brussels City in Danger

HOT Theme: BruXsel

Orpheline / Weeskind / Orphan...

Belgium is falling apart: How Brussels' citizens defend their multicultural community...

Home - Accueil - Startseite - Startpagina

Monday
Jun112007

Daniel Pipes rallies his anti-Islam and anti-Europe team in Malibu

If, by chance, today or tomorrow, you are in Malibu, California, and you have nothing better to do, go and watch a rare collection of frustrated, angry and godless European intellectuals. They are meeting in the Public School Section of Pepperdine University, where Daniel Pipes is a visiting Professor since Jan. 1, 2007. Theme is nothing less than:

The Collapse Of Europe, The Rise Of Islam and the Consequences for the United States



The collapse of Europe carries no question mark for the participants. They believe in it as firmly as some Californian sects believe in the space ships from Mars that are soon coming to pick up them for salvation and redemption, leaving the mass of idle earthlings behind to burn in hell.
The Program of the Conference is witness:
SUNDAY, JUNE 10, 2007

Introduction: The Collapse of Europe
9:00 am - 9:15 am
Overview: Avi Davis, Senior Fellow, American Freedom Alliance 9:15 am - 10:00 am
Opening Plenary: The nature of the threat to Europe and its impact on the United States.
Keynote Speaker: Mark Steyn

Mark Steyn is a Canadian humorist. I am not acquainted with Canadian humor. But I suppose it is something that makes you laugh. Perhaps, the following dark prophecy, written by Steyn in the Opinion Journal from the Wall Street Journal Opinion Page on January 4, 2006, provokes a sardonic "Schadenfreude" laughter when a specific kind of US audience is present?
It's the Demography, Stupid
The real reason the West is in danger of extinction.

BY MARK STEYN
Wednesday, January 4, 2006 12:01 a.m. EST

Most people reading this have strong stomachs, so let me lay it out as baldly as I can: Much of what we loosely call the Western world will not survive this century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our lifetimes, including many if not most Western European countries. There'll probably still be a geographical area on the map marked as Italy or the Netherlands--probably--just as in Istanbul there's still a building called St. Sophia's Cathedral. But it's not a cathedral; it's merely a designation for a piece of real estate. Likewise, Italy and the Netherlands will merely be designations for real estate. The challenge for those who reckon Western civilization is on balance better than the alternatives is to figure out a way to save at least some parts of the West.

One obstacle to doing that is that, in the typical election campaign in your advanced industrial democracy, the political platforms of at least one party in the United States and pretty much all parties in the rest of the West are largely about what one would call the secondary impulses of society--government health care, government day care (which Canada's thinking of introducing), government paternity leave (which Britain's just introduced). We've prioritized the secondary impulse over the primary ones: national defense, family, faith and, most basic of all, reproductive activity--"Go forth and multiply," because if you don't you won't be able to afford all those secondary-impulse issues, like cradle-to-grave welfare.

Americans sometimes don't understand how far gone most of the rest of the developed world is down this path: In the Canadian and most Continental cabinets, the defense ministry is somewhere an ambitious politician passes through on his way up to important jobs like the health department. I don't think Don Rumsfeld would regard it as a promotion if he were moved to Health and Human Services. [..]

No, no - I did not invent this. The Wall Street Journal printed this nonsense and carries it still proudly on its website. You got the message, loud and clearly. Caring Conservatism at it's best. Shut up about health care. Fuck against the Turk! Until the Aya Sophia is full of smart little rosy-white babies, tended for by subdued white Christian mothers who forgot about women's lib! Don Rumsfeld won't be there any more, to oversee that shock and awe, but Cheney's daughter will show you the way. Did you know, that the Virgin Mary got her child the same way as she did?

The conference couldn't have had a better start than this. And now, with the same Canadian clown Mark Steyn as moderator, straightaway into the heart of the matter:

10:00 am - 11:15 am
Panel Session: What has been the role of Islam and the EU bureaucracy in fostering collapse?
Moderator: Mark Steyn
Panelists: Greg Davis, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Ibn Warraq, Philippe Karsenty
I am not sure, who Greg Davis is. He may be the Evangelist 'Bishop' Greg S. Davis, who, with his Amy, is permanently on "Campus Mission", as (how funny!) "Davis verses Goliath". (By the way, Davis, it is: "versus", not verses. - Is this stupid error a heavenly signal, that the collapse of Western Civilization has already begun?) Mr. Davis is evangelist for the "Church of Jesus Christ", the denomination of the founder of Pepperdine High School in 1937. So, if I got the wrong Davis, his portrait conveys a feel for what Pepperdine is about.

How will the second member of this panel, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, feel, after Steyn's and Davis' introductions? Will she follow Mark Steyn, and get many, many white Christian babies in order to push the Turk out of Aya Sophia? Will she agree, that "faith" is a core business of national Government? And that care for beaten women is of a secondary rank?
- No, no: She will do as she always does: Tell her own tear-jerking story and put some humor in it. That'll make her the third clown in a row. Everybody will be moved and laugh. Sweet girl goes too far in denying God, but that is forgiven, for she will painstakingly avoid talking about other religions than the Islam. "Pipes vaut bien une messe", will she think after French king Henry IV, when he as a protestant, joined the catholic faith to get what he was after: to be ruler of France.
She will probably also be the first speaker, who tackles the subject of the panel. The collapse. At first, I did not understand, why all of a sudden, worries about "European Bureaucracy" were introduced in the meeting. Is our Brussels peaceful office-park undermined by Moroccan dishwashers, Turkish cleaning ladies and other such Muslim staff? Or, are the well-paid European aides who are living in villas in the thriving countryside, members of the world-wide dhimmy conspiracy, that cancer of progressive "good-doers"?

"It is Turkey, stupid!"
After another hard effort to understand the thinking of the "Collapse" initiators, I saw the light: Olli Rehn! Rehn is the European Commissioner for "Enlargement". As such, this Finn is the main responsible for relations between the EU and Turkey, for he manages the accession negotiations with that country. European Commissioners are not necessarily "bureaucrats". Most of them are former members of Government, appointed on a political basis, and confirmed by the European Parliament. A position, comparable to an US Undersecretary of State.
Like the NeoCons, the Pipes family doesn't want to hear about an European Government structure. That is why the pejorative title "bureaucrat" is used.
And what did the man do, to "foster" the "European Collapse", giving in to "Islam"? What's his crime?
Well, in the name of the European Commission, and of all member states, he warned the Turkish army generals in May, that an eventual army coup against the elected government of Turkey, would put an end to EU-Turkish accession negotiations. The Copenhagen Criteria (2002) for accession, do simply not allow military dictators as prospective EU members.
But such "bureaucrat" rules mean nothing to Pipes and Ali, who, in very similar articles, around 10 May, had called for an European green light for the generals. In the name of blocking the Islam. Pipes wrote in the US press, and Ali in the German "Die Welt" and a series of other leading European papers. The army-sponsored manifestations of "secularists" in several Turkish cities against the election of a Turkish president by a general vote, represented, it was true, only a minority of the Turks. But Hirsi Ali argued, that the Turkish secularists (whom she calls, for unknown reasons "liberals"), needed some time to make up for their "errors" and so win over a majority of the population. What were those "errors"? Well, the "liberals" had neglected the social part of their program and lost contact with the majority of the population, said Hirsi Ali. Anybody, who knows something about Turkey, remebers, however, that the last "secularist" Turkish government (led by conservatives and business interests - no "liberals" around) collapsed dramatically in a tsunami of corruption scandals and criminal maffia-connections.
I am afraid, that Ali's Turkish "liberals" have wasted their time since the overwhelming AKP victory at the subsequent elections, in reading Mark Steyn's humorous articles and following his advice, not to invest into "secondary impulsions like government health care" etc.
It is not easy, to be a Turk who seeks Pipes' and Ali's approval. Their mistake is, that they did not understand, that Steyn's "WJ" injunctions are ONLY for Christian Western Countries. Turks should do the opposite: no more fucking but only caring, and leave the "primary impulsions" to countries that God (or the US) have elected for that business.

All the same, we may expect, that Hirsi Ali will come up with a fitting punishment for those Eurobureaucrats who are so arrogant that they remain deaf for her (and Pipes') instructions!

- And here, I suggest a short break. Although I have only dealt with three people on the long list of very interesting actors at the Pepperdine happening, I have to leave you. Not Europe, but only me, is collapsing. Tomorrow, is another day.

In the next posts, we will dissect Mr. Pipes himself and meet old friends like Leon de Winter, Afshin Ellian, Claire Berlinski and a whole lot of new ones.

My primary impulse is for the moment: going to sleep.

Saturday
Jun092007

Tomoyo & Birds 9.6.07 [FR]

1191208-861238-thumbnail.jpgShana n'arrête pas de se perfectionner dans les dessins, inspirés par les mangas japonais. Celui-ci est fort apprécié par la communauté des japanophiles sur DeviantArt. Je comprends! - Du haut de ses onze ans, elle a fait un dessin "plongé" (vu d'en-haut). Ce qui n'est pas évident... (Cliquer sur l'image pour le voir en grand)

Elle a été conseillée par son ami Hideki (Eki). Dans les "Artist Comments" de Shana, le pauvre bonhomme est taquiné à un degré, que moi, je ne peux point me permettre vis à vis de l'artiste elle-même... 

Artist's Comments

Voilà... je suis là, devant mon écran (pas besoin de préciser que je mange un yoghurt, mais bon XD) ... Et j'ai envie d'écrire un texte bien sur ce dessin et la personne à qui est dédié ce dessin...
D'abord... Cela fait longtemps que je voulais dessiner ça, mais je ne me sentais pas encore au niveau. Mais je l'ai fait, mon premier dessin en plongée ! XD
C'est réussi, d'après vous? enfin bon, il y a encore quelques petits défauts, entre autre la main - les doigts boudinnés/anorexiques XD - les oiseaux, etc.. Mais en global, je l'aime mon dessin <3 Un de mes préférés depuis... Longtemps. Peut-être mon préféré de tous mes dessins ? Enfin bon. Je me suis inspirée de beaucoup de choses - de Tomoyo, quoi, mais aussi pour la porte de TRC n° 7, la couverture du n° 7 pour les oiseaux, ...
Voilà... Maintenant... (ça c'est le texte dans mon journal)
Eki. Un super ami XD Je ne vois pas d'autre mot... Il est tellement sympathique ^^ poli, aimable XD oui Eki tu es quelqu'un de bien ! Je te le garantis ! è_é Il dessine bien, il a plein de qualités, mais il ne se l'avoue pas ^^ Ce grand dadet (ortho? XD) de 17 ans XD Et Eki, ne t'inquiète pas, on vaincra les poissons ! XD Et... Je te suis aussi reconnaissante pour un tas de trucs =D
Hideki... Il a vécu beaucoup de choses difficiles dans sa vie, mais il les a toutes surmontées, la preuve, il est encore là avec nous =) Bon, d'accord, il ressemble un peu à une fille et est obligé de s'hab... Non, vaut mieux pas que je dise XD Mais Eki, c'est Eki ! Quelqu'un d'unique et de très spécial... Bon, en exclusif, la liste de toutes ses particularités (j'en oublierai surement XD)

Raisinsectivore
Fourbe
Effeminé XD
Bizarre
Sensé
Il ne se ressemble pas lui-même
Il est estivaleur (contraire d'hiberneur)
Bishi
Bourré à ses heures perdues
Grand écrivain
Tordu
Révolutionnaire XD
Il est aussi le frère d'une fille très, très espiègle et qui a réussi à faire une photo de lui bourré XD
Travesti (à ses heures perdues aussi)
Fille, et soeur de moi et Ria


... Et j'en passe ^_^
(^^', je sais même pas pourquoi j'ai écrit tout ça sur Eki X3)

Garde ton Eki-libre, ma fille....

Friday
Jun082007

Murmures 3a - Le Sentier Complet 8.6.07 [FR]

Voici la différence entre un vrai photographe et moi.

À comparer avec ce que je montre dans une note précedente: Murmures 3: Rôti et Musique avec les Gaulois du 14 mai 2007. Mon seul avantage, c'est qu'on peut écouter chez moi un petit bout de leur musique et regarder les instruments qui bougent de droite à gauche, de gauche à droite...

murmuresVrymenam7513.jpg

Car... Était également présent à la fête de Gesves (de clôture de l'inauguration des Murmures): Jacques van Rymenam. Auteur des Impressions Fugitives: À chaque jour, sa photo. Il en était à sa 2551me photo, le 8 juin 2007! (Le lien vous fait arriver sur la photo du jour où vous avez cliqué...) On peut s'y abonner. Et s'offrir chaque jour un moment de réflexion, grâce aux textes poétiques qui accompagnent chaque image.

Le texte qui accompagne cette photo de l'orchestre:

Balatonföldvár. C'était la soirée de clôture de la Fête de Mai.
La salle était immense, haute. Tout à fait, années 70. Comme l'orchestre d'ailleurs.
Très sérieux, même un peu guindé. Il interprétait les grands standards de jazz.
Deux ou trois couples abandonnaient parfois leur bière pour un pas de danse.
C'est les tables de formica qui d'un coup m'ont rappelé Balatonföldvár...
Oui, c'était fou ! Ce soir-là, j'ai retrouvé dans le Condroz de 2007
exactement l'ambiance des stations balnéaires hongroises fin sixties, début seventies...

 L'"input" hongrois dans les Murmures-2007, lui a peut-être inspiré cette association-là...

Depuis beaucoup d'années, Van Rymenam publie sur le net des photos rêveuses, remplies d'atmosphère, de nostalgie et de sagesse qu'il a prises en Wallonie ou dans les régions qui l'entourent. Un sujet principal est le fleuve, La Meuse: Cours d'eau de moyenne taille qui descend lentement des collines de l'Est de la France, en parcourant les Ardennes, vers les Pays-Bas, qu'il entre près de Maestricht et qu'il quitte pour se jeter, uni au Rhin, dans la mer.

Plusieurs oeuvres du Sentier figurent (comme chaque année) parmi les photos du jour de mai et de juin. (Cliquer sur l'image pour l'admirer dans sa taille originale!)

1191208-861103-thumbnail.jpg 

 Impression Fugitive:

Le rêveur. Véronique et Marc ont réalisé leur rêve...
Le rêveur commence à prendre forme...
Suspendu à l'intérieur de son cocon aérien,
il se balancera mollement au gré des brises, au creux d'un vallon de Gesves...

Le rêveur est une oeuvre réalisée par Véronique Decoster et Marc De Smedt
dans le cadre de la Fête de mai 2007 (Murmures en mai).

Marc Desmedt travaille le bois. Il a construit notre cuisine à Bruxelles, ce printemps, en jouant avec la difficile matière qui est le bois. Comme un maître...

 

1191208-861129-thumbnail.jpg Géode et spirales... Une structure de bois construite avec passion.

Des emboîtements parfaits qui donnent naissance à une géode au milieu des bois...
Michel Haveaux souhaite suggérer au travers de son oeuvre
des spirales en mouvement où la lumière change et vit...

Le portail, porte vers les mondes est une oeuvre réalisée par Michel Haveaux dans le cadre de la Fête de mai 2007 (Murmures en mai).

 1191208-861133-thumbnail.jpgUn bon coup de balai.

Au milieu de champs et de prés,
bien propres et ordonnés,
trois immenses balais ont officié...
Et les détritus, jadis éparpillés,
sont désormais regroupés...
Un bon coup de balai. est une oeuvre réalisée par Made
dans le cadre de la Fête de mai 2007 (Murmures en mai).

Jusqu'ici: Impressions Fugitives.

Moi, je vous dois encore une série d'images (dans une galerie sur ce blog, "Murmures 4" - vous verrez bientôt l'annonce dans la colonne de droite) sur les panneaux impressionnants des jeunes réfugiés politiques de Namur, également présents sur le Sentier de la Fête de Mai-2007:

1191208-861147-thumbnail.jpg< Les panneaux1191208-861171-thumbnail.jpg.    

 

 Détail:
La Chine, la Russie, l'Arménie > 

 

 

 

Thursday
Jun072007

Paul Wolfowitz and Neocon Morals 7.6.07 [EN]

Originally meant as a short text, introducing my personal thougts at the Wolfowitz tragicomedy (see below: Wolfowitz: It wasn't me- Shaha told me that Iraqi oil would pay for our occupation of Iraq...), it grew into an autonomous article that is presented here as a separate post.

wolfriza7515.jpgAs we all know by now, Paul Wolfowitz an Shaha Riza split immediately after Wolfowitz' announcement of his stepping down as World bank President. 

What has been Shaha's error, in trusting Paul, and then, feeling betrayed by him?

I think, it is something that is inherent to neoconservative morals (or: philosophy, if you like). Shaha may (rightly) have considered herself as a more staunch neocon than her friend, but she forgot that in a leninist or stalinist cabal, you hierarchical rank is not defined by your degree of fidelity to the political line, but by "higher" considerations, which are the exclusive domain of the political bureau. Paul is not even close to being a member of that Bureau. But he is (was!) a more valuable chess piece in the neocon powerplay tha she was (is).

The neoconservative powerplay is played on domains of influence and control, if not in completely controlled front-organisations like the American Enterprise Institute. Chess-piece Shaha had to be (temporarily) removed in order to deploy the powers of the new World Bank president. 

 Shaha believed that the actual tactical position of the neoconservatives in promoting the "American Century" in the world, was a principled one. She thought, that it is their highest principle, that democracy has to be promoted everywhere and by all means. She believed them, when they say, that women's rights are central to a civilised society. As a fervent democracy-imposer in the Middle-East and as a staunch soldier for women's rights against islamist backwardness, she really thought, that she was of more importance to the neoconservative objectives than her egghead-boyfriend.

She could have known better: The main allies of the neoconservatives are the christian right in the US. Nobody has ever seen a neocon object against their middle-age concepts about women, girls, sexuality and public morals. 'Democracy' is not an issue, when it suits the US to ally themselves with Ethiopian slaughterers or Croatian post-fascists.

But she didn't. And that is how a tragicomedy unfolded: Poor Paulie was seen as responsible for her woes. And dumped right away. Of course, in a broad sense, Wolfowitz, as a neoconservative theoretician, is responsible for them. But the guy doesn't know. If I understand him well, he is deeply convinced of the logic of neoconservative views on policy-making, as they are rooted in an obscure line of philosophical thinking that has been imported into Chicago University from Germany.

 Since long, I am fascinated by Paul D. Wolfowitz, the man who could have been a quiet sociology professor at a middle ranking university in the USA. But, driven by the teachings of the Heideggerian ex-German professors Leo Strauss and Albert Wohlstetter in Chicago,  he got lost in the neocon- and Washington predators' jungle. Employed as an innocent, but useful  (intellectual contributions) idiot (incapable of keeping up with the Rumsfelds' and the Cheneys' verbial aggressions).

The Strauss-Wohlstetter school justifies itself by way of Plato and his Republic governed by philosophers. Classic conservatism, as represented by Edmund Burke at the end of the 18th century, modernized that notion in their struggle against general elections, as provided for in the US (1772) and French (1791) constitutions. That is honest and straight conservatism: Elitist and cynical.

The NeoConservatives however, are inspired by Heidegger, who, in the thirties, in Germany, tried to superimpose upon the Nazi obscurantist "ideology" and it's overwhelming success in mobilizing the people for world domination by way of instincts and fears, his ideas of a dominating network of philosophers, "at the other side of time and daily existence", who would overrule vulgar types like Hitler, Goebbels and Göring. In Heidegger's philopsophy, the content of the ideology and the objectives of a mass movement are of secondary rank. What matters to him and his followers (conscious or inconscious) is the answer to the question: "Does it, yes or no, move, occupy, inspire the masses?" As long as they are occupied in the social sphere, we, the philosophical élite, can go forward with our own political agenda. This is also, what populism does. Only, many of populist agitators also believe in the nonsense they are selling. Neocons don't. People who follow them and compromize with the influence and money they have ready, will encounter dramatic surprises, the inevitable moment the Neocons suddenly decide, that another movement suits their ends better.

The Roots of neocon elitism

Those roots are in the thoroughly aristocratic, elitist, idea of the state as the apanage of a few chosen philosophers. An idea that goes back to Plato and Aristoteles. Democracy, generalized voting, are OK as long as they limit themselves to management of the 'social'. 'Real' politics (relations with the exterior world, defense, culture and higher education as well as religion and morals) are reserved for those who think.
The property, the wealth of the city, the state, are for the elite to wield. For they feel, that they ARE the state. They see no difference between their own purse and the treasury.
It was indeed Martin Heidegger, who, during the twenties of the last century, re-adopted this view of society and it's structure. That is what led him during the thirties to the illusion, that he could work with the Nazis, rewriting their primitive ideology around the "Führer-Prinzip" (leader-principle) into a Platonic concept. He must have thought: The Nazi "Führer" are now, for a long time to come, the state-elite. The state IS that elite. That elite IS the State. But they need a little hand from a REAL philosopher for the NON-social issues.
This way of thinking arrived to the US in a complicated, often contradictory, way. And it was soon adapted to their needs and desires by quite different schools of thinking. We mentioned already the neoconservatives (whose founders come from a Communist sect).
 
But also Hannah Arend, who was a pupil and a 'short time companion' to Heidegger, distinguishes between 'politics' and 'social'. However, she envisions self-management: The social by the masses and their representatives, the political by a thinking elite. But her interpretations differ in practice stark from those of the neocons. She was an advocate of self-management as a way to emancipation and civilization. She was a champion against authoritarianism and its wicked manipulation of public opinion. She admired in the Founding Fathers not especially their freemason inspired secret society character, as well their sound ideas and laws that were made for the best of freedom and the pusuing of happiness for all citizens. She (rightly, in my opinion), saw the Founding Fathers (and, for that matter, many of the statebuilders of the French Revolution) as wise people, who did not abuse in their self-interest, the powers they wielded over society. That is undoubtedly also, what Plato originally meant.
Here is what  Stephen Eric Bronner writes about the roots of neoconservatism in LOGOS, spring 2004, a Quarterly Journal of modern society and culture:
(Bronner is Professor (II) of Political Science at Rutgers University, Senior Editor of Logos, and most recently the author of Imagining the Possible: Radical Politics for Conservative Times  (Routledge) and Reclaiming the Enlightenment: Toward a Politics of Radical Engagement (Columbia University Press).
Neo-conservatism begins with different premises. Certain members of its staunchest advocates like Perle and Wolfowitz originally met and became friends in seminars at the University of Chicago given by Albert Wohlstetter, the mathematician and senior staff member at the Rand Corporation. A few like Allan Bloom, author of The Closing of the American Mind, may have been influenced by the writings of the important political philosopher, Leo Strauss, at the University of Chicago.
But neo-conservatism actually has little in common with his attempt to develop an intellectual “aristocracy” capable of preserving the classical tradition in a “mass democracy.” No less than Plato, perhaps, neo-conservatives may think they are employing the “noble lie.”
But their form of lying is far more banal than the attempt of this great thinker to veil the lack of philosophical foundations for an ideal state.
Neo-conservatives employ their mendacity no differently than any ordinary group of liars: to justify this interest or cover up that mistake. 

Neocons think that the own the state 

All this means also, that, tendentially at least, neoconservatives consider the state as their own, exclusive domain. Including its budget, its personnel and its freedom to do to other states and peoples in the world everything that it considers as justified by its own interests and objectives. People like Wolfowitz are so far away from reality, that they even do not expect, that others (bank personnel, international co-directors who represent financial stakeholders, the public, even girlfriends), may think differently.

He still will not understand that he helped to waste 31 billions of American taxpayers money in Iraq. For he doesn't see that that money is not his money. He thinks, he owned it. The same is true for the million he spent on calming Shaha, when she had to leave her post at the Bank

Wolfowitz' 15 pages 'written reply' to the World bank ethics Investigation Committee report, argues, that it was in no way Paul D. Wolfowitz, who did something wrong. It is the OTHERS: The ethical committee who missed the courage needed to confront his rapacious girlfriend. And, that "intractable' woman herself.
The neo-conservative Bank President thinks, that he has to deal with the procedure. That it could be wrong in itself, regardless of procedures and responsibilities, to spend public money to buy peace in your household, apparently did not come to mind.

He must still think that that is not the question. He had a private problem. He felt guilty to furious Shaha. Neocon unity was in danger. Public money should pay for it. 

 As the incomparable Maureen Dowd (20/5/07) said so rightly in the NYT:

Wolfie used public compensation for private contrition. Gilt for guilt — not a good deal.

 A (too) rare revelation of the mendacity and authoritarian mind of a group who dominate Washington policies for too long now.

Who doesn't denounce it, will be guilty of having helped Evil to happen:

burke%207603.gif